 privacy_consent: Separate automated emails send process
Before https://github.com/OCA/data-protection/pull/29 there was a race condition where an email could be sent while the same transaction that created the `privacy.consent` record still wasn't committed, producing a 404 error if the user clicked on "Accept" or "Reject" before all mails were sent.
To avoid that, a raw `cr.commit()` was issued, but this produced another situation where the user had to wait until the full email queue is cleared to get his page loaded. It wasn't an error, but a long queue meant several minutes waiting, and it's ulikely that an average human is so patient.
So, here's the final fix (I hope!). The main problem was that I was looking in the wrong place to send the email. It turns out that the `self.post_message_with_template()` method is absolutely helpless in the case at hand, where these criteria must be met:
* E-mail must be enqueued, no matter if there are less or more than 50 consents to send.
* The template must be processed per record.
* In an ideal world, a `cr.commit()` must be issued after each sent mail.
The metod that was being used:
* Didn't allow to use `auto_commit` mode.
* Only allowed to render the template per record if called with `composition_mode="mass_mail"`.
* Only allowed to enqueue emails if called with `composition_mode="mass_post"`.
Obviously, I cannot set 2 different values for `composition_mode`, so a different strategy had to be used.
I discovered that the `mail.template` model has a helpful method called `send_mail()` that, by default:
* Renders the template per record
* Enqueues the email
* The email queue is cleared in `auto_commit=True` mode.
So, from now on, problems are gone:
* The user click, or the cron run, will just generate the missing `privacy.consent` records and enqueue mails for them.
* The mail queue manager will send them later, in `auto_commit` mode.
* After sending the e-mail, this module will set the `privacy.consent` record as `sent`.
* Thanks to *not* sending the email, the process the user faces when he hits the "generate" button is faster.
* Instructions in the README and text in the "generate" button are updated to reflect this new behavior.
* Thanks to the `auto_commit` feature, if Odoo is rebooted in the middle of a mail queue clearance, the records that were sent remain properly marked as sent, and the missing mails will be sent after the next boot.
* No hardcoded commits.
* No locked transactions.
* BTW I discovered that 2 different emails were created when creating a new consent. I started using `mail_create_nolog=True` to avoid that problem and only log a single creation message.
Note to self: never use again `post_message_with_template()`.
5 years ago privacy_consent: Separate automated emails send process
Before https://github.com/OCA/data-protection/pull/29 there was a race condition where an email could be sent while the same transaction that created the `privacy.consent` record still wasn't committed, producing a 404 error if the user clicked on "Accept" or "Reject" before all mails were sent.
To avoid that, a raw `cr.commit()` was issued, but this produced another situation where the user had to wait until the full email queue is cleared to get his page loaded. It wasn't an error, but a long queue meant several minutes waiting, and it's ulikely that an average human is so patient.
So, here's the final fix (I hope!). The main problem was that I was looking in the wrong place to send the email. It turns out that the `self.post_message_with_template()` method is absolutely helpless in the case at hand, where these criteria must be met:
* E-mail must be enqueued, no matter if there are less or more than 50 consents to send.
* The template must be processed per record.
* In an ideal world, a `cr.commit()` must be issued after each sent mail.
The metod that was being used:
* Didn't allow to use `auto_commit` mode.
* Only allowed to render the template per record if called with `composition_mode="mass_mail"`.
* Only allowed to enqueue emails if called with `composition_mode="mass_post"`.
Obviously, I cannot set 2 different values for `composition_mode`, so a different strategy had to be used.
I discovered that the `mail.template` model has a helpful method called `send_mail()` that, by default:
* Renders the template per record
* Enqueues the email
* The email queue is cleared in `auto_commit=True` mode.
So, from now on, problems are gone:
* The user click, or the cron run, will just generate the missing `privacy.consent` records and enqueue mails for them.
* The mail queue manager will send them later, in `auto_commit` mode.
* After sending the e-mail, this module will set the `privacy.consent` record as `sent`.
* Thanks to *not* sending the email, the process the user faces when he hits the "generate" button is faster.
* Instructions in the README and text in the "generate" button are updated to reflect this new behavior.
* Thanks to the `auto_commit` feature, if Odoo is rebooted in the middle of a mail queue clearance, the records that were sent remain properly marked as sent, and the missing mails will be sent after the next boot.
* No hardcoded commits.
* No locked transactions.
* BTW I discovered that 2 different emails were created when creating a new consent. I started using `mail_create_nolog=True` to avoid that problem and only log a single creation message.
Note to self: never use again `post_message_with_template()`.
5 years ago privacy_consent: Separate automated emails send process
Before https://github.com/OCA/data-protection/pull/29 there was a race condition where an email could be sent while the same transaction that created the `privacy.consent` record still wasn't committed, producing a 404 error if the user clicked on "Accept" or "Reject" before all mails were sent.
To avoid that, a raw `cr.commit()` was issued, but this produced another situation where the user had to wait until the full email queue is cleared to get his page loaded. It wasn't an error, but a long queue meant several minutes waiting, and it's ulikely that an average human is so patient.
So, here's the final fix (I hope!). The main problem was that I was looking in the wrong place to send the email. It turns out that the `self.post_message_with_template()` method is absolutely helpless in the case at hand, where these criteria must be met:
* E-mail must be enqueued, no matter if there are less or more than 50 consents to send.
* The template must be processed per record.
* In an ideal world, a `cr.commit()` must be issued after each sent mail.
The metod that was being used:
* Didn't allow to use `auto_commit` mode.
* Only allowed to render the template per record if called with `composition_mode="mass_mail"`.
* Only allowed to enqueue emails if called with `composition_mode="mass_post"`.
Obviously, I cannot set 2 different values for `composition_mode`, so a different strategy had to be used.
I discovered that the `mail.template` model has a helpful method called `send_mail()` that, by default:
* Renders the template per record
* Enqueues the email
* The email queue is cleared in `auto_commit=True` mode.
So, from now on, problems are gone:
* The user click, or the cron run, will just generate the missing `privacy.consent` records and enqueue mails for them.
* The mail queue manager will send them later, in `auto_commit` mode.
* After sending the e-mail, this module will set the `privacy.consent` record as `sent`.
* Thanks to *not* sending the email, the process the user faces when he hits the "generate" button is faster.
* Instructions in the README and text in the "generate" button are updated to reflect this new behavior.
* Thanks to the `auto_commit` feature, if Odoo is rebooted in the middle of a mail queue clearance, the records that were sent remain properly marked as sent, and the missing mails will be sent after the next boot.
* No hardcoded commits.
* No locked transactions.
* BTW I discovered that 2 different emails were created when creating a new consent. I started using `mail_create_nolog=True` to avoid that problem and only log a single creation message.
Note to self: never use again `post_message_with_template()`.
5 years ago privacy_consent: Separate automated emails send process
Before https://github.com/OCA/data-protection/pull/29 there was a race condition where an email could be sent while the same transaction that created the `privacy.consent` record still wasn't committed, producing a 404 error if the user clicked on "Accept" or "Reject" before all mails were sent.
To avoid that, a raw `cr.commit()` was issued, but this produced another situation where the user had to wait until the full email queue is cleared to get his page loaded. It wasn't an error, but a long queue meant several minutes waiting, and it's ulikely that an average human is so patient.
So, here's the final fix (I hope!). The main problem was that I was looking in the wrong place to send the email. It turns out that the `self.post_message_with_template()` method is absolutely helpless in the case at hand, where these criteria must be met:
* E-mail must be enqueued, no matter if there are less or more than 50 consents to send.
* The template must be processed per record.
* In an ideal world, a `cr.commit()` must be issued after each sent mail.
The metod that was being used:
* Didn't allow to use `auto_commit` mode.
* Only allowed to render the template per record if called with `composition_mode="mass_mail"`.
* Only allowed to enqueue emails if called with `composition_mode="mass_post"`.
Obviously, I cannot set 2 different values for `composition_mode`, so a different strategy had to be used.
I discovered that the `mail.template` model has a helpful method called `send_mail()` that, by default:
* Renders the template per record
* Enqueues the email
* The email queue is cleared in `auto_commit=True` mode.
So, from now on, problems are gone:
* The user click, or the cron run, will just generate the missing `privacy.consent` records and enqueue mails for them.
* The mail queue manager will send them later, in `auto_commit` mode.
* After sending the e-mail, this module will set the `privacy.consent` record as `sent`.
* Thanks to *not* sending the email, the process the user faces when he hits the "generate" button is faster.
* Instructions in the README and text in the "generate" button are updated to reflect this new behavior.
* Thanks to the `auto_commit` feature, if Odoo is rebooted in the middle of a mail queue clearance, the records that were sent remain properly marked as sent, and the missing mails will be sent after the next boot.
* No hardcoded commits.
* No locked transactions.
* BTW I discovered that 2 different emails were created when creating a new consent. I started using `mail_create_nolog=True` to avoid that problem and only log a single creation message.
Note to self: never use again `post_message_with_template()`.
5 years ago privacy_consent: Separate automated emails send process
Before https://github.com/OCA/data-protection/pull/29 there was a race condition where an email could be sent while the same transaction that created the `privacy.consent` record still wasn't committed, producing a 404 error if the user clicked on "Accept" or "Reject" before all mails were sent.
To avoid that, a raw `cr.commit()` was issued, but this produced another situation where the user had to wait until the full email queue is cleared to get his page loaded. It wasn't an error, but a long queue meant several minutes waiting, and it's ulikely that an average human is so patient.
So, here's the final fix (I hope!). The main problem was that I was looking in the wrong place to send the email. It turns out that the `self.post_message_with_template()` method is absolutely helpless in the case at hand, where these criteria must be met:
* E-mail must be enqueued, no matter if there are less or more than 50 consents to send.
* The template must be processed per record.
* In an ideal world, a `cr.commit()` must be issued after each sent mail.
The metod that was being used:
* Didn't allow to use `auto_commit` mode.
* Only allowed to render the template per record if called with `composition_mode="mass_mail"`.
* Only allowed to enqueue emails if called with `composition_mode="mass_post"`.
Obviously, I cannot set 2 different values for `composition_mode`, so a different strategy had to be used.
I discovered that the `mail.template` model has a helpful method called `send_mail()` that, by default:
* Renders the template per record
* Enqueues the email
* The email queue is cleared in `auto_commit=True` mode.
So, from now on, problems are gone:
* The user click, or the cron run, will just generate the missing `privacy.consent` records and enqueue mails for them.
* The mail queue manager will send them later, in `auto_commit` mode.
* After sending the e-mail, this module will set the `privacy.consent` record as `sent`.
* Thanks to *not* sending the email, the process the user faces when he hits the "generate" button is faster.
* Instructions in the README and text in the "generate" button are updated to reflect this new behavior.
* Thanks to the `auto_commit` feature, if Odoo is rebooted in the middle of a mail queue clearance, the records that were sent remain properly marked as sent, and the missing mails will be sent after the next boot.
* No hardcoded commits.
* No locked transactions.
* BTW I discovered that 2 different emails were created when creating a new consent. I started using `mail_create_nolog=True` to avoid that problem and only log a single creation message.
Note to self: never use again `post_message_with_template()`.
5 years ago |
|
# Copyright 2018 Tecnativa - Jairo Llopis# License AGPL-3.0 or later (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl).
from odoo.exceptions import ValidationErrorfrom odoo.tests.common import HttpCase
class ActivityCase(HttpCase): def setUp(self): super(ActivityCase, self).setUp() self.cron = self.env.ref("privacy_consent.cron_auto_consent") self.cron_mail_queue = self.env.ref( "mail.ir_cron_mail_scheduler_action") self.sync_blacklist = self.env.ref("privacy_consent.sync_blacklist") self.mt_consent_consent_new = self.env.ref( "privacy_consent.mt_consent_consent_new") self.mt_consent_acceptance_changed = self.env.ref( "privacy_consent.mt_consent_acceptance_changed") self.mt_consent_state_changed = self.env.ref( "privacy_consent.mt_consent_state_changed") # Some partners to ask for consent self.partners = self.env["res.partner"] self.partners += self.partners.create({ "name": "consent-partner-0", "email": "partner0@example.com", }) self.partners += self.partners.create({ "name": "consent-partner-1", "email": "partner1@example.com", }) self.partners += self.partners.create({ "name": "consent-partner-2", "email": "partner2@example.com", }) # Partner without email, on purpose self.partners += self.partners.create({ "name": "consent-partner-3", }) # Blacklist some partners self.blacklists = self.env["mail.blacklist"] self.blacklists += self.blacklists._add("partner1@example.com") # Activity without consent self.activity_noconsent = self.env["privacy.activity"].create({ "name": "activity_noconsent", "description": "I'm activity 1", }) # Activity with auto consent, for all partners self.activity_auto = self.env["privacy.activity"].create({ "name": "activity_auto", "description": "I'm activity auto", "subject_find": True, "subject_domain": repr([("id", "in", self.partners.ids)]), "consent_required": "auto", "default_consent": True, "server_action_id": self.sync_blacklist.id, }) # Activity with manual consent, skipping partner 0 self.activity_manual = self.env["privacy.activity"].create({ "name": "activity_manual", "description": "I'm activity 3", "subject_find": True, "subject_domain": repr([("id", "in", self.partners[1:].ids)]), "consent_required": "manual", "default_consent": False, "server_action_id": self.sync_blacklist.id, })
def check_activity_auto_properly_sent(self): """Check emails sent by ``self.activity_auto``.""" consents = self.env["privacy.consent"].search([ ("activity_id", "=", self.activity_auto.id), ]) # Check pending mails for consent in consents: self.assertEqual(consent.state, "draft") messages = consent.message_ids self.assertEqual(len(messages), 2) # Check sent mails self.cron_mail_queue.method_direct_trigger() for consent in consents: self.assertEqual(consent.state, "sent") messages = consent.message_ids self.assertEqual(len(messages), 3) # 2nd message notifies creation self.assertEqual( messages[2].subtype_id, self.mt_consent_consent_new, ) # 3rd message notifies subject # Placeholder links should be logged self.assertTrue("/privacy/consent/accept/" in messages[1].body) self.assertTrue("/privacy/consent/reject/" in messages[1].body) # Tokenized links shouldn't be logged self.assertFalse(consent._url(True) in messages[1].body) self.assertFalse(consent._url(False) in messages[1].body) # 4th message contains the state change self.assertEqual( messages[0].subtype_id, self.mt_consent_state_changed, ) # Partner's is_blacklisted should be synced with default consent self.assertFalse(consent.partner_id.is_blacklisted)
def test_default_template(self): """We have a good mail template by default.""" good = self.env.ref("privacy_consent.template_consent") self.assertEqual( self.activity_noconsent.consent_template_id, good, ) self.assertEqual( self.activity_noconsent.consent_template_default_body_html, good.body_html, ) self.assertEqual( self.activity_noconsent.consent_template_default_subject, good.subject, )
def test_find_subject_if_consent_required(self): """If user wants to require consent, it needs subjects.""" # Test the onchange helper onchange_activity1 = self.env["privacy.activity"].new( self.activity_noconsent.copy_data()[0]) self.assertFalse(onchange_activity1.subject_find) onchange_activity1.consent_required = "auto" onchange_activity1._onchange_consent_required_subject_find() self.assertTrue(onchange_activity1.subject_find) # Test very dumb user that forces an error with self.assertRaises(ValidationError): self.activity_noconsent.consent_required = "manual"
def test_template_required_auto(self): """Automatic consent activities need a template.""" self.activity_noconsent.subject_find = True self.activity_noconsent.consent_template_id = False self.activity_noconsent.consent_required = "manual" with self.assertRaises(ValidationError): self.activity_noconsent.consent_required = "auto"
def test_generate_manually(self): """Manually-generated consents work as expected.""" for partner in self.partners: if partner.email: self.blacklists._remove(partner.email) result = self.activity_manual.action_new_consents() self.assertEqual(result["res_model"], "privacy.consent") consents = self.env[result["res_model"]].search(result["domain"]) self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("state"), ["draft"] * 2) self.assertEqual( consents.mapped("partner_id.is_blacklisted"), [False] * 2, ) self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("accepted"), [False] * 2) self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("last_metadata"), [False] * 2) # Check sent mails messages = consents.mapped("message_ids") self.assertEqual(len(messages), 2) subtypes = messages.mapped("subtype_id") self.assertTrue(subtypes & self.mt_consent_consent_new) self.assertFalse(subtypes & self.mt_consent_acceptance_changed) self.assertFalse(subtypes & self.mt_consent_state_changed) # Send one manual request action = consents[0].action_manual_ask() self.assertEqual(action["res_model"], "mail.compose.message") composer = self.env[action["res_model"]] \ .with_context(active_ids=consents[0].ids, active_model=consents._name, **action["context"]).create({}) composer.onchange_template_id_wrapper() composer.send_mail() messages = consents.mapped("message_ids") - messages self.assertEqual(len(messages), 2) self.assertEqual(messages[0].subtype_id, self.mt_consent_state_changed) self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("state"), ["sent", "draft"]) self.assertEqual( consents.mapped("partner_id.is_blacklisted"), [False, False], ) # Placeholder links should be logged self.assertTrue("/privacy/consent/accept/" in messages[1].body) self.assertTrue("/privacy/consent/reject/" in messages[1].body) # Tokenized links shouldn't be logged accept_url = consents[0]._url(True) reject_url = consents[0]._url(False) self.assertNotIn(accept_url, messages[1].body) self.assertNotIn(reject_url, messages[1].body) # Visit tokenized accept URL result = self.url_open(accept_url).text self.assertIn("accepted", result) self.assertIn(reject_url, result) self.assertIn(self.activity_manual.name, result) self.assertIn(self.activity_manual.description, result) consents.invalidate_cache() self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("accepted"), [True, False]) self.assertTrue(consents[0].last_metadata) self.assertFalse(consents[0].partner_id.is_blacklisted) self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("state"), ["answered", "draft"]) self.assertEqual( consents[0].message_ids[0].subtype_id, self.mt_consent_acceptance_changed, ) # Visit tokenized reject URL result = self.url_open(reject_url).text self.assertIn("rejected", result) self.assertIn(accept_url, result) self.assertIn(self.activity_manual.name, result) self.assertIn(self.activity_manual.description, result) consents.invalidate_cache() self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("accepted"), [False, False]) self.assertTrue(consents[0].last_metadata) self.assertTrue(consents[0].partner_id.is_blacklisted) self.assertEqual(consents.mapped("state"), ["answered", "draft"]) self.assertEqual( consents[0].message_ids[0].subtype_id, self.mt_consent_acceptance_changed, ) self.assertFalse(consents[1].last_metadata)
def test_generate_automatically(self): """Automatically-generated consents work as expected.""" result = self.activity_auto.action_new_consents() self.assertEqual(result["res_model"], "privacy.consent") self.check_activity_auto_properly_sent()
def test_generate_cron(self): """Cron-generated consents work as expected.""" self.cron.method_direct_trigger() self.check_activity_auto_properly_sent()
def test_mail_template_without_links(self): """Cannot create mail template without needed links.""" with self.assertRaises(ValidationError): self.activity_manual.consent_template_id.body_html = "No links :("
|
