Remove RowExclusiveLock on exception_rule
The goal of the modified method is to create or remove the relationship
(in the M2m relation tabel) between the tested model (such as
sale_order) and the exception rules. When the ORM writes on
ExceptionRule.sale_ids (using the example of sale_exception), it will
first proceeds with these updates:
* an UPDATE on exception_rule to set the write_date
* INSERT or DELETE on the relation table
* but then, as "write" is called on the exception rule, the ORM will
trigger the api.depends to recompute all the "main_exception_ids"
of the records (sales, ...) related to it, leading to an UPDATE
for each sale order
We end up with RowExclusiveLock on such records:
* All the records of the relation table added / deleted for the current
sale order
* All the records of exception_rule matching the current sale order
* All the records of sale_order related to the exception rules matching
the current sale order
The first one is expected, the next 2 are not. We can remove the lock on
the exception_rule table by removing `_log_access`, however in any case,
the main_exception_ids computed field will continue to lock many sale
orders, effectively preventing 2 sales orders with the same exception
to be confirmed at the same time.
Reversing the write by writing on SaleOrder instead of ExceptionRule
fixes the 2 unexpected locks. It should not result in more queries: the
"to remove" part generates a DELETE on the relation table for the rule
to remove and the "to add" part generates an INSERT for the rule to add,
both will be exactly the same in both cases.
Related to #1642
Replaces #1638
5 years ago Remove RowExclusiveLock on exception_rule
The goal of the modified method is to create or remove the relationship
(in the M2m relation tabel) between the tested model (such as
sale_order) and the exception rules. When the ORM writes on
ExceptionRule.sale_ids (using the example of sale_exception), it will
first proceeds with these updates:
* an UPDATE on exception_rule to set the write_date
* INSERT or DELETE on the relation table
* but then, as "write" is called on the exception rule, the ORM will
trigger the api.depends to recompute all the "main_exception_ids"
of the records (sales, ...) related to it, leading to an UPDATE
for each sale order
We end up with RowExclusiveLock on such records:
* All the records of the relation table added / deleted for the current
sale order
* All the records of exception_rule matching the current sale order
* All the records of sale_order related to the exception rules matching
the current sale order
The first one is expected, the next 2 are not. We can remove the lock on
the exception_rule table by removing `_log_access`, however in any case,
the main_exception_ids computed field will continue to lock many sale
orders, effectively preventing 2 sales orders with the same exception
to be confirmed at the same time.
Reversing the write by writing on SaleOrder instead of ExceptionRule
fixes the 2 unexpected locks. It should not result in more queries: the
"to remove" part generates a DELETE on the relation table for the rule
to remove and the "to add" part generates an INSERT for the rule to add,
both will be exactly the same in both cases.
Related to #1642
Replaces #1638
5 years ago Remove RowExclusiveLock on exception_rule
The goal of the modified method is to create or remove the relationship
(in the M2m relation tabel) between the tested model (such as
sale_order) and the exception rules. When the ORM writes on
ExceptionRule.sale_ids (using the example of sale_exception), it will
first proceeds with these updates:
* an UPDATE on exception_rule to set the write_date
* INSERT or DELETE on the relation table
* but then, as "write" is called on the exception rule, the ORM will
trigger the api.depends to recompute all the "main_exception_ids"
of the records (sales, ...) related to it, leading to an UPDATE
for each sale order
We end up with RowExclusiveLock on such records:
* All the records of the relation table added / deleted for the current
sale order
* All the records of exception_rule matching the current sale order
* All the records of sale_order related to the exception rules matching
the current sale order
The first one is expected, the next 2 are not. We can remove the lock on
the exception_rule table by removing `_log_access`, however in any case,
the main_exception_ids computed field will continue to lock many sale
orders, effectively preventing 2 sales orders with the same exception
to be confirmed at the same time.
Reversing the write by writing on SaleOrder instead of ExceptionRule
fixes the 2 unexpected locks. It should not result in more queries: the
"to remove" part generates a DELETE on the relation table for the rule
to remove and the "to add" part generates an INSERT for the rule to add,
both will be exactly the same in both cases.
Related to #1642
Replaces #1638
5 years ago Remove RowExclusiveLock on exception_rule
The goal of the modified method is to create or remove the relationship
(in the M2m relation tabel) between the tested model (such as
sale_order) and the exception rules. When the ORM writes on
ExceptionRule.sale_ids (using the example of sale_exception), it will
first proceeds with these updates:
* an UPDATE on exception_rule to set the write_date
* INSERT or DELETE on the relation table
* but then, as "write" is called on the exception rule, the ORM will
trigger the api.depends to recompute all the "main_exception_ids"
of the records (sales, ...) related to it, leading to an UPDATE
for each sale order
We end up with RowExclusiveLock on such records:
* All the records of the relation table added / deleted for the current
sale order
* All the records of exception_rule matching the current sale order
* All the records of sale_order related to the exception rules matching
the current sale order
The first one is expected, the next 2 are not. We can remove the lock on
the exception_rule table by removing `_log_access`, however in any case,
the main_exception_ids computed field will continue to lock many sale
orders, effectively preventing 2 sales orders with the same exception
to be confirmed at the same time.
Reversing the write by writing on SaleOrder instead of ExceptionRule
fixes the 2 unexpected locks. It should not result in more queries: the
"to remove" part generates a DELETE on the relation table for the rule
to remove and the "to add" part generates an INSERT for the rule to add,
both will be exactly the same in both cases.
Related to #1642
Replaces #1638
5 years ago |
|
# Copyright 2011 Raphaël Valyi, Renato Lima, Guewen Baconnier, Sodexis # Copyright 2017 Akretion (http://www.akretion.com) # Mourad EL HADJ MIMOUNE <mourad.elhadj.mimoune@akretion.com> # License AGPL-3.0 or later (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html).
import time import html from odoo import api, fields, models, _ from odoo.exceptions import UserError, ValidationError from odoo.tools.safe_eval import safe_eval from odoo import osv
class ExceptionRule(models.Model): _name = "exception.rule" _description = "Exception Rule" _order = "active desc, sequence asc"
name = fields.Char("Exception Name", required=True, translate=True) description = fields.Text("Description", translate=True) sequence = fields.Integer( string="Sequence", help="Gives the sequence order when applying the test", ) model = fields.Selection(selection=[], string="Apply on", required=True)
exception_type = fields.Selection( selection=[ ("by_domain", "By domain"), ("by_py_code", "By python code"), ("by_method", "By method"), ], string="Exception Type", required=True, default="by_py_code", help="By python code: allow to define any arbitrary check\n" "By domain: limited to a selection by an odoo domain:\n" " performance can be better when exceptions " " are evaluated with several records", ) domain = fields.Char("Domain") method = fields.Selection(selection=[], string="Method", readonly=True) active = fields.Boolean("Active", default=True) code = fields.Text( "Python Code", help="Python code executed to check if the exception apply or " "not. Use failed = True to block the exception", )
@api.constrains("exception_type", "domain", "code", "model") def check_exception_type_consistency(self): for rule in self: if ( (rule.exception_type == "by_py_code" and not rule.code) or (rule.exception_type == "by_domain" and not rule.domain) or (rule.exception_type == "by_method" and not rule.method) ): raise ValidationError( _( "There is a problem of configuration, python code, " "domain or method is missing to match the exception " "type." ) )
@api.multi def _get_domain(self): """ override me to customize domains according exceptions cases """ self.ensure_one() return safe_eval(self.domain)
class BaseExceptionMethod(models.AbstractModel): _name = "base.exception.method" _description = "Exception Rule Methods"
@api.multi def _get_main_records(self): """
Used in case we check exceptions on a record but write these exceptions on a parent record. Typical example is with sale.order.line. We check exceptions on some sale order lines but write these exceptions on the sale order, so they are visible. """
return self
@api.multi def _reverse_field(self): raise NotImplementedError()
def _rule_domain(self): """Filter exception.rules.
By default, only the rules with the correct model will be used. """
return [("model", "=", self._name)]
@api.multi def detect_exceptions(self): """List all exception_ids applied on self
Exception ids are also written on records """
rules = self.env["exception.rule"].sudo().search(self._rule_domain()) all_exception_ids = [] rules_to_remove = {} rules_to_add = {} for rule in rules: records_with_exception = self._detect_exceptions(rule) reverse_field = self._reverse_field() main_records = self._get_main_records() commons = main_records & rule[reverse_field] to_remove = commons - records_with_exception to_add = records_with_exception - commons # we expect to always work on the same model type if rule.id not in rules_to_remove: rules_to_remove[rule.id] = main_records.browse() rules_to_remove[rule.id] |= to_remove if rule.id not in rules_to_add: rules_to_add[rule.id] = main_records.browse() rules_to_add[rule.id] |= to_add if records_with_exception: all_exception_ids.append(rule.id) # Cumulate all the records to attach to the rule # before linking. We don't want to call "rule.write()" # which would: # * write on write_date so lock the expection.rule # * trigger the recomputation of "main_exception_id" on # all the sale orders related to the rule, locking them all # and preventing concurrent writes # Reversing the write by writing on SaleOrder instead of # ExceptionRule fixes the 2 kinds of unexpected locks. # It should not result in more queries than writing on ExceptionRule: # the "to remove" part generates one DELETE per rule on the relation # table # and the "to add" part generates one INSERT (with unnest) per rule. for rule_id, records in rules_to_remove.items(): records.write({"exception_ids": [(3, rule_id)]}) for rule_id, records in rules_to_add.items(): records.write(({"exception_ids": [(4, rule_id)]})) return all_exception_ids
@api.model def _exception_rule_eval_context(self, rec): return { "time": time, "self": rec, # object, obj: deprecated. # should be removed in future migrations "object": rec, "obj": rec, # copy context to prevent side-effects of eval # should be deprecated too, accesible through self. "context": self.env.context.copy(), }
@api.model def _rule_eval(self, rule, rec): expr = rule.code space = self._exception_rule_eval_context(rec) try: safe_eval( expr, space, mode="exec", nocopy=True ) # nocopy allows to return 'result' except Exception as e: raise UserError( _( "Error when evaluating the exception.rule " "rule:\n %s \n(%s)" ) % (rule.name, e) ) return space.get("failed", False)
@api.multi def _detect_exceptions(self, rule): if rule.exception_type == "by_py_code": return self._detect_exceptions_by_py_code(rule) elif rule.exception_type == "by_domain": return self._detect_exceptions_by_domain(rule) elif rule.exception_type == "by_method": return self._detect_exceptions_by_method(rule)
@api.multi def _get_base_domain(self): return [("ignore_exception", "=", False), ("id", "in", self.ids)]
@api.multi def _detect_exceptions_by_py_code(self, rule): """
Find exceptions found on self. """
domain = self._get_base_domain() records = self.search(domain) records_with_exception = self.env[self._name] for record in records: if self._rule_eval(rule, record): records_with_exception |= record return records_with_exception
@api.multi def _detect_exceptions_by_domain(self, rule): """
Find exceptions found on self. """
base_domain = self._get_base_domain() rule_domain = rule._get_domain() domain = osv.expression.AND([base_domain, rule_domain]) return self.search(domain)
@api.multi def _detect_exceptions_by_method(self, rule): """
Find exceptions found on self. """
base_domain = self._get_base_domain() records = self.search(base_domain) return getattr(records, rule.method)()
class BaseException(models.AbstractModel): _inherit = "base.exception.method" _name = "base.exception" _order = "main_exception_id asc" _description = "Exception"
main_exception_id = fields.Many2one( "exception.rule", compute="_compute_main_error", string="Main Exception", store=True, ) exceptions_summary = fields.Html( "Exceptions Summary", compute="_compute_exceptions_summary" ) exception_ids = fields.Many2many( "exception.rule", string="Exceptions", copy=False ) ignore_exception = fields.Boolean("Ignore Exceptions", copy=False)
@api.multi def action_ignore_exceptions(self): self.write({"ignore_exception": True}) return True
@api.depends("exception_ids", "ignore_exception") def _compute_main_error(self): for rec in self: if not rec.ignore_exception and rec.exception_ids: rec.main_exception_id = rec.exception_ids[0] else: rec.main_exception_id = False
@api.depends("exception_ids", "ignore_exception") def _compute_exceptions_summary(self): for rec in self: if rec.exception_ids and not rec.ignore_exception: rec.exceptions_summary = "<ul>%s</ul>" % "".join( [ "<li>%s: <i>%s</i></li>" % tuple(map(html.escape, (e.name, e.description))) for e in rec.exception_ids ] )
@api.multi def _popup_exceptions(self): action = self._get_popup_action().read()[0] action.update( { "context": { "active_id": self.ids[0], "active_ids": self.ids, "active_model": self._name, } } ) return action
@api.model def _get_popup_action(self): return self.env.ref("base_exception.action_exception_rule_confirm")
@api.multi def _check_exception(self): """
This method must be used in a constraint that must be created in the object that inherits for base.exception. for sale : @api.constrains('ignore_exception',) def sale_check_exception(self): ... ... self._check_exception """
exception_ids = self.detect_exceptions() if exception_ids: exceptions = self.env["exception.rule"].browse(exception_ids) raise ValidationError("\n".join(exceptions.mapped("name")))
|