Browse Source
[ADD] web_context_tunnel
[ADD] web_context_tunnel
help solving the new arguments passing to on change method in addonspull/2/head
unknown
11 years ago
committed by
unknown
4 changed files with 132 additions and 0 deletions
-
0web_context_tunnel/__init__.py
-
92web_context_tunnel/__openerp__.py
-
26web_context_tunnel/static/src/js/context_tunnel.js
-
14web_context_tunnel/static/test/context_tunnel.js
@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ |
|||
{ |
|||
'name': 'Web Context Tunnel', |
|||
'category': 'Hidden', |
|||
'author': 'Akretion', |
|||
'license': 'AGPL-3', |
|||
'description':""" |
|||
Web Context Tunnel. |
|||
=================== |
|||
|
|||
The problem with OpenERP on_changes |
|||
----------------------------------- |
|||
|
|||
OpenERP uses to pass on_change Ajax events arguments using positional |
|||
arguments. This is annoying as modules often need to pass extra arguments |
|||
that are not present in the base on_change signatures. As soon as two modules |
|||
try to alter this signature to add their extra arguments, they are incompatible |
|||
between them unless some extra glue module make them compatible again by |
|||
taking all extra arguments into account. But this leads to a combinatorial |
|||
explosion to make modules compatible again. |
|||
|
|||
The solution |
|||
------------ |
|||
|
|||
This module provides a simple work around that will work in most of the cases. |
|||
In fact it works if the base on_change is designed to pass the context |
|||
argument. Else it won't work and you should go the old way. But in any case |
|||
it's a bad practice if an on_change doesn't pass the context argument and you |
|||
can certainly rant about these bad on_changes to the the context added in the |
|||
arguments. |
|||
|
|||
So for an on_change passing the context, how does this module works? |
|||
|
|||
Well OpenERP already has an elegant solution for an extension module to alter |
|||
an XML attributes: put an extension point in the view using |
|||
position="attributes" and then redefine the attribute. That is already used at |
|||
several places to replace the "context" attribute that the client will send to |
|||
the server. |
|||
|
|||
The idea here is to wrap the extra arguments needed by your on_change inside |
|||
that context dictionary just as it were a regular Python kwargs. That context |
|||
should then be automatically propagated accross the on_change call chain, |
|||
no matter of the module order and without any need to hack any on_change |
|||
signature. |
|||
|
|||
The issue with just position="attributes" and redefining the context, is that |
|||
again, if two independent modules redefine the context, they are incompatible |
|||
unless a third module accounts for both of them. |
|||
|
|||
But with this module, an extension point can now use position="attributes" and |
|||
instead of redefining the "context" attribute, you will now just define a new |
|||
"context_foo" attribute this way: |
|||
<attribute name="context_foo">{'my_extra_field': my_extra_field}</attribute>. |
|||
|
|||
This module modifies the web client in such a way that before sending the Ajax |
|||
on_change event request to the server, all the node attributes starting with |
|||
"context" are merged into a single context dictionnary, keeping the keys and |
|||
values from all extensions. In the rare case a module really wants to override |
|||
the value in context, then it needs to still override the original context |
|||
attribute (or the other original attribute). |
|||
|
|||
And of course, if you should call your on_change by API or webservice instead |
|||
of using the web client, simply ensure you are wrapping the required extra |
|||
arguments in the context dictionary. |
|||
|
|||
Tests |
|||
----- |
|||
|
|||
This module comes with a simple test in static/test/context_tunnel.js. |
|||
To run it, open the page /web/tests?mod=web_context_tunnel in your browser |
|||
as explained here https://doc.openerp.com/trunk/web/testing |
|||
It should also by picked by the Python testing when testing with PhantomJS. |
|||
|
|||
As for testing modules using web_context_tunnel with YAML, yes it's possible. |
|||
In fact you need to manually mimic the new web-client behavior by manually |
|||
ensuring you add the extra context keys you will need later in your on_change. |
|||
For instance, before the on_change is called, you can alter the context with |
|||
a !python statement like context.update({'my_extra_field': my_extra_field}). |
|||
|
|||
You can see an example of module conversion to use web_context_tunnel here |
|||
for instance: |
|||
https://github.com/openerpbrasil/l10n_br_core/compare/develop...feature%2Fsale-web-context-tunnel |
|||
""", |
|||
'version': '2.0', |
|||
'depends': ['web'], |
|||
'js': ['static/src/js/context_tunnel.js'], |
|||
'test': [ |
|||
'static/test/context_tunnel.js', |
|||
], |
|||
'css': [], |
|||
'auto_install': False, |
|||
'web_preload': False, |
|||
} |
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ |
|||
openerp.web_context_tunnel = function(instance) { |
|||
|
|||
instance.web.form.FormWidget.prototype.build_context = function() { |
|||
var v_context = false; |
|||
var fields_values = false; |
|||
// instead of using just the attr context, we merge any attr starting with context
|
|||
for (var key in this.node.attrs) { |
|||
if (key.substring(0, 7) === "context") { |
|||
if (!v_context) { |
|||
fields_values = this.field_manager.build_eval_context(); |
|||
v_context = new instance.web.CompoundContext(this.node.attrs[key]).set_eval_context(fields_values); |
|||
} else { |
|||
v_context = new instance.web.CompoundContext(this.node.attrs[key], v_context).set_eval_context(fields_values); |
|||
} |
|||
|
|||
} |
|||
} |
|||
if (!v_context) { |
|||
v_context = (this.field || {}).context || {}; |
|||
} |
|||
return v_context; |
|||
}; |
|||
}; |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
// vim:et fdc=0 fdl=0:
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ |
|||
openerp.testing.section('context_tunnel', { |
|||
}, function (test) { |
|||
test.dependencies = window['oe_all_dependencies']; |
|||
test("context composition", function (instance) { |
|||
var field_manager = new instance.web.form.DefaultFieldManager(); |
|||
var node = {'attrs': {'context': {'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 'value2'}, 'context_2': {'key3': 'value3'}, 'context_3': {'key4': 'value4'}}} |
|||
var w = new instance.web.form.FormWidget(field_manager, node); |
|||
var context = w.build_context().eval(); |
|||
ok(context['key1'] === 'value1', 'right value for key1 in context'); |
|||
ok(context['key2'] === 'value2', 'right value for key2 in context'); |
|||
ok(context['key3'] === 'value3', 'right value for key3 in context'); |
|||
ok(context['key4'] === 'value4', 'right value for key4 in context'); |
|||
}); |
|||
}); |
Write
Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
Reference in new issue