From 48e8f885d52cfe570c70325aa42102c3516dfd60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Holger Brunn Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:22:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] [FIX] coding style --- web_advanced_filters/model/ir_filters.py | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/web_advanced_filters/model/ir_filters.py b/web_advanced_filters/model/ir_filters.py index 0a58e1b4..488c5a02 100644 --- a/web_advanced_filters/model/ir_filters.py +++ b/web_advanced_filters/model/ir_filters.py @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ class IrFilters(Model): context=context): domain = eval_n(this['domain_this']) for u in self.read(cr, uid, this['union_filter_ids'], - ['domain', 'evaluate_always', 'model_id'], - context=context): + ['domain', 'evaluate_always', 'model_id'], + context=context): if u['evaluate_always']: matching_ids = self.pool[u['model_id']].search( cr, uid, eval_n(u['domain']), @@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ class IrFilters(Model): context=None): self.write(cr, uid, ids, {'domain_this': field_value}) - def _evaluate_get(self, cr, uid, ids, field_name, args, - context=None): + def _evaluate_get(self, cr, uid, ids, field_name, args, context=None): """check if this filter contains references to x2many fields. If so, then negation goes wrong in nearly all cases, so we evaluate the filter and remove its resulting ids"""