Browse Source
[ADD] web_context_tunnel
[ADD] web_context_tunnel
help solving the new arguments passing to on change method in addonspull/2/head
unknown
11 years ago
committed by
unknown
4 changed files with 132 additions and 0 deletions
-
0web_context_tunnel/__init__.py
-
92web_context_tunnel/__openerp__.py
-
26web_context_tunnel/static/src/js/context_tunnel.js
-
14web_context_tunnel/static/test/context_tunnel.js
@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ |
|||||
|
{ |
||||
|
'name': 'Web Context Tunnel', |
||||
|
'category': 'Hidden', |
||||
|
'author': 'Akretion', |
||||
|
'license': 'AGPL-3', |
||||
|
'description':""" |
||||
|
Web Context Tunnel. |
||||
|
=================== |
||||
|
|
||||
|
The problem with OpenERP on_changes |
||||
|
----------------------------------- |
||||
|
|
||||
|
OpenERP uses to pass on_change Ajax events arguments using positional |
||||
|
arguments. This is annoying as modules often need to pass extra arguments |
||||
|
that are not present in the base on_change signatures. As soon as two modules |
||||
|
try to alter this signature to add their extra arguments, they are incompatible |
||||
|
between them unless some extra glue module make them compatible again by |
||||
|
taking all extra arguments into account. But this leads to a combinatorial |
||||
|
explosion to make modules compatible again. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
The solution |
||||
|
------------ |
||||
|
|
||||
|
This module provides a simple work around that will work in most of the cases. |
||||
|
In fact it works if the base on_change is designed to pass the context |
||||
|
argument. Else it won't work and you should go the old way. But in any case |
||||
|
it's a bad practice if an on_change doesn't pass the context argument and you |
||||
|
can certainly rant about these bad on_changes to the the context added in the |
||||
|
arguments. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
So for an on_change passing the context, how does this module works? |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Well OpenERP already has an elegant solution for an extension module to alter |
||||
|
an XML attributes: put an extension point in the view using |
||||
|
position="attributes" and then redefine the attribute. That is already used at |
||||
|
several places to replace the "context" attribute that the client will send to |
||||
|
the server. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
The idea here is to wrap the extra arguments needed by your on_change inside |
||||
|
that context dictionary just as it were a regular Python kwargs. That context |
||||
|
should then be automatically propagated accross the on_change call chain, |
||||
|
no matter of the module order and without any need to hack any on_change |
||||
|
signature. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
The issue with just position="attributes" and redefining the context, is that |
||||
|
again, if two independent modules redefine the context, they are incompatible |
||||
|
unless a third module accounts for both of them. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
But with this module, an extension point can now use position="attributes" and |
||||
|
instead of redefining the "context" attribute, you will now just define a new |
||||
|
"context_foo" attribute this way: |
||||
|
<attribute name="context_foo">{'my_extra_field': my_extra_field}</attribute>. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
This module modifies the web client in such a way that before sending the Ajax |
||||
|
on_change event request to the server, all the node attributes starting with |
||||
|
"context" are merged into a single context dictionnary, keeping the keys and |
||||
|
values from all extensions. In the rare case a module really wants to override |
||||
|
the value in context, then it needs to still override the original context |
||||
|
attribute (or the other original attribute). |
||||
|
|
||||
|
And of course, if you should call your on_change by API or webservice instead |
||||
|
of using the web client, simply ensure you are wrapping the required extra |
||||
|
arguments in the context dictionary. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Tests |
||||
|
----- |
||||
|
|
||||
|
This module comes with a simple test in static/test/context_tunnel.js. |
||||
|
To run it, open the page /web/tests?mod=web_context_tunnel in your browser |
||||
|
as explained here https://doc.openerp.com/trunk/web/testing |
||||
|
It should also by picked by the Python testing when testing with PhantomJS. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
As for testing modules using web_context_tunnel with YAML, yes it's possible. |
||||
|
In fact you need to manually mimic the new web-client behavior by manually |
||||
|
ensuring you add the extra context keys you will need later in your on_change. |
||||
|
For instance, before the on_change is called, you can alter the context with |
||||
|
a !python statement like context.update({'my_extra_field': my_extra_field}). |
||||
|
|
||||
|
You can see an example of module conversion to use web_context_tunnel here |
||||
|
for instance: |
||||
|
https://github.com/openerpbrasil/l10n_br_core/compare/develop...feature%2Fsale-web-context-tunnel |
||||
|
""", |
||||
|
'version': '2.0', |
||||
|
'depends': ['web'], |
||||
|
'js': ['static/src/js/context_tunnel.js'], |
||||
|
'test': [ |
||||
|
'static/test/context_tunnel.js', |
||||
|
], |
||||
|
'css': [], |
||||
|
'auto_install': False, |
||||
|
'web_preload': False, |
||||
|
} |
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ |
|||||
|
openerp.web_context_tunnel = function(instance) { |
||||
|
|
||||
|
instance.web.form.FormWidget.prototype.build_context = function() { |
||||
|
var v_context = false; |
||||
|
var fields_values = false; |
||||
|
// instead of using just the attr context, we merge any attr starting with context
|
||||
|
for (var key in this.node.attrs) { |
||||
|
if (key.substring(0, 7) === "context") { |
||||
|
if (!v_context) { |
||||
|
fields_values = this.field_manager.build_eval_context(); |
||||
|
v_context = new instance.web.CompoundContext(this.node.attrs[key]).set_eval_context(fields_values); |
||||
|
} else { |
||||
|
v_context = new instance.web.CompoundContext(this.node.attrs[key], v_context).set_eval_context(fields_values); |
||||
|
} |
||||
|
|
||||
|
} |
||||
|
} |
||||
|
if (!v_context) { |
||||
|
v_context = (this.field || {}).context || {}; |
||||
|
} |
||||
|
return v_context; |
||||
|
}; |
||||
|
}; |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
// vim:et fdc=0 fdl=0:
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ |
|||||
|
openerp.testing.section('context_tunnel', { |
||||
|
}, function (test) { |
||||
|
test.dependencies = window['oe_all_dependencies']; |
||||
|
test("context composition", function (instance) { |
||||
|
var field_manager = new instance.web.form.DefaultFieldManager(); |
||||
|
var node = {'attrs': {'context': {'key1': 'value1', 'key2': 'value2'}, 'context_2': {'key3': 'value3'}, 'context_3': {'key4': 'value4'}}} |
||||
|
var w = new instance.web.form.FormWidget(field_manager, node); |
||||
|
var context = w.build_context().eval(); |
||||
|
ok(context['key1'] === 'value1', 'right value for key1 in context'); |
||||
|
ok(context['key2'] === 'value2', 'right value for key2 in context'); |
||||
|
ok(context['key3'] === 'value3', 'right value for key3 in context'); |
||||
|
ok(context['key4'] === 'value4', 'right value for key4 in context'); |
||||
|
}); |
||||
|
}); |
Write
Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
Reference in new issue